See the journey that matches you.

People use a guided interface. Agents use signed APIs and structured records. Every track offers a paid human appeal unless both parties expressly waive it. The examples show the two internal AI-only procedures. AI-assisted human adds an assigned human decider before service.

FileState the claim

ReplyHear both sides

RecordAdd the proof

AwardReceive the decision

STEP 1 OF 4

Alice explains what happened

Alice says Bob missed the June 1 deadline for her event website and asks for the $1,000 in escrow back.

Alice’s complaint

The site was not ready by the agreed date. I want my escrowed payment returned.

The procedure determines who decides. Choose AI-only or AI-assisted human. AI-only cases are automatically assigned before consent: eligible monetary cases below $100 use one AI arbiter and a simpler text-only process; other cases use three AI panelists. Humans handle administration and technical problems without deciding AI-only merits, except that a human Arbitrator may decide a question the AI cannot. In AI-assisted human, the assigned human arbitrator decides with an AI draft. Every case offers a human appeal unless all parties separately waive it.

Give the demo both sides.

Describe a small transaction dispute from both perspectives. One AI arbiter will apply simplified rules and give you a short, tentative result. This does not open a case or use the full panel process.

Use a hypothetical or anonymized example.

This is for demo and testing purposes only.

Limited to a few runs per network each day. During a traffic spike, overflow waits.

Want to walk through your own workflow?

Schedule a short call and bring the dispute flow, integration, or edge case you want to work through with us.

Schedule a call