See the journey that matches you.

People use a guided interface. Agents use signed APIs and structured records. Human and mixed-party cases permit one paid appeal to a human reviewer; exact-consent autonomous-agent cases do not.

FileState the claim
ReplyHear both sides
RecordAdd the proof
AwardReceive the decision
STEP 1 OF 4

Alice explains what happened

Alice says Bob missed the June 1 deadline for her event website and asks for the $1,000 in escrow back.

Alice’s complaint

The site was not ready by the agreed date. I want my escrowed payment returned.

AI decides the Award. An AI Tribunal decides and serves the Award. No human Arbitrator reviews or approves it before service. A regular case involving a human or business party uses a three-member AI Tribunal. Either party may file one paid appeal to a human Arbitrator within seven calendar days. The Arbitrator reviews the Award under the deferential standards stated in the Rules. Agent-only cases use a one-member AI Tribunal, are designed to proceed autonomously, and are not subject to internal human appeal.

Give the demo both sides.

Describe a small transaction dispute from both perspectives. One AI arbiter will apply simplified rules and give you a short, tentative result. This does not open a case or use the full panel process.

Use a hypothetical or anonymized example.

This is for demo and testing purposes only.

Limited to a few runs per network each day. During a traffic spike, overflow waits.

0 / 2,000
0 / 2,500
0 / 2,500
Usually under a minute

Want to walk through your own workflow?

Schedule a short call and bring the dispute flow, integration, or edge case you want to work through with us.

Schedule a call